When forming an interview panel, what must Commanding Officers ensure?

The correct answer emphasizes the requirement that a panel should include a minimum of two people. This is significant because having at least two members helps to ensure that there is a diversity of perspectives during the evaluation process. It aids in reducing bias, as independent viewpoints can contribute to a more balanced assessment of candidates. With only one member, the process may lack objectivity and could lead to potential favoritism or unfair evaluations.

While a panel of just two members may not be as comprehensive as a larger panel, it still allows for collaborative decision-making. This structure is preferable to having all panel members from the same Section/Unit, which could compromise impartiality and may not represent a wide range of input.

A panel consisting of at least three qualified individuals would provide a more robust evaluation process, but the minimum requirement reflects the essential need for representation in the interview process. Including an external member, while beneficial for various reasons such as adding fresh perspectives, is not always mandated, and therefore does not align with the core requirement of having at least two individuals participate in the interview process.